Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
talk:proposals:ralxtew_for_mod [2013/02/20 11:31] venomthrope I TOLD YOU DOG |
talk:proposals:ralxtew_for_mod [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
| I WARNED YOU YOU COULD HAVE STOPPED THIS, NOW ITS TOO LATE, THE END IS HERE.-[[people:venomthrope|I TOLD YOU]]- | I WARNED YOU YOU COULD HAVE STOPPED THIS, NOW ITS TOO LATE, THE END IS HERE.-[[people:venomthrope|I TOLD YOU]]- | ||
| + | |||
| + | 4 months only? You're kidding right? People that want to be mods should at least have played on the server 6 months...even better if more than a year! -[[people:MystiaLorelei|Myschii]]- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ralxtew would not make for a bad mod. He's helpful, friendly and pretty active—but so are many others players. There have been a lot of mod proposals lately, and everyone seems to be trying to get their favourite into office. But instead of unsystematically adding new decent mods because they wouldn't do a terrible job, and thus bloating the ranks, I would deem it wiser to cleanse the current ranks of subpar or inactive mods, and then to see where there is a need for supplements: if any timezones are not yet covered by the staff members' schedules, if some language diversity was needed, &c.\\ | ||
| + | Ralx is Italian, one of only two (I think), and online at times when Enton, te3, or mazznoff are often around as well. I thus don't see what compelling reaons there are to make him a mod over simply appreciating him as a good player. -[[people:P_P_A|P.P.A.]]- | ||