Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
talk:proposals:ralxtew_for_mod [2013/02/19 04:31]
koentinius [Opposed]
talk:proposals:ralxtew_for_mod [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
Line 9: Line 9:
 Good enough for mod, less than political, but has a feel for the current landscape, diplomatic, slow to anger, as active as anyone as far as I know.  Not my first choice mind, but ranks in the top ten or so. --- //​[[people:​juinn|Juinn]] 18/02/2013 18:29 (PST)// Good enough for mod, less than political, but has a feel for the current landscape, diplomatic, slow to anger, as active as anyone as far as I know.  Not my first choice mind, but ranks in the top ten or so. --- //​[[people:​juinn|Juinn]] 18/02/2013 18:29 (PST)//
  
 +raslx is a rathe unbiased Player, he never took sides in any war and respects all other players on the server -shako
 +
 +**Best dragon** also there always seem to be a lack of mods on, it can't hurt to have another mod at least we know this guy isn't a cunt. If he abuses you can just remove him from the position with little to no harm done.  --- //​[[greenkitten@rocketmail.com|green kitten]] 2013/02/19 05:11//
 +
 +>"​Little to no harm done." Lolwut? After Aineias rolled back the entire server we never got back all the stuff we had built. 2 days of progress lost forever. ​ --- //​[[caBst@irc.dev-urandom.eu|caBastard]] 2013/02/19 05:24//
 +> Aineias was an idiot though ​ --- //​[[greenkitten@rocketmail.com|green kitten]] 2013/02/19 06:06//
 ====== Opposed ====== ====== Opposed ======
 >having been around for only four months\\ >having been around for only four months\\
Line 20: Line 26:
  
 No voting on mods. Notify te3 if you think someone is worthy. He'll then think about it. EDIT: Apparantly voting on mods has become common practice (ie. Mazznoff). Carry on. --- //​[[Koentinius@irc.dev-urandom.eu|Koentinius]] 2013/02/19 04:23// No voting on mods. Notify te3 if you think someone is worthy. He'll then think about it. EDIT: Apparantly voting on mods has become common practice (ie. Mazznoff). Carry on. --- //​[[Koentinius@irc.dev-urandom.eu|Koentinius]] 2013/02/19 04:23//
 +>Voting doesn'​t actually matter, more of a guage of how the community feels and te3 has the final say.  --- //​[[sikandarmc@gmail.com|Sikandar]] 2013/02/19 04:32//>
 + 
 +I WARNED YOU YOU COULD HAVE STOPPED THIS, NOW ITS TOO LATE, THE END IS HERE.-[[people:​venomthrope|I TOLD YOU]]-
 +
 +4 months only? You're kidding right? People that want to be mods should at least have played on the server 6 months...even better if more than a year! -[[people:​MystiaLorelei|Myschii]]-
 +
 +Ralxtew would not make for a bad mod. He's helpful, friendly and pretty active—but so are many others players. There have been a lot of mod proposals lately, and everyone seems to be trying to get their favourite into office. But instead of unsystematically adding new decent mods because they wouldn'​t do a terrible job, and thus bloating the ranks, I would deem it wiser to cleanse the current ranks of subpar or inactive mods, and then to see where there is a need for supplements:​ if any timezones are not yet covered by the staff members'​ schedules, if some language diversity was needed, &c.\\
 +Ralx is Italian, one of only two (I think), and online at times when Enton, te3, or mazznoff are often around as well. I thus don't see what compelling reaons there are to make him a mod over simply appreciating him as a good player. -[[people:​P_P_A|P.P.A.]]-
  • talk/proposals/ralxtew_for_mod.1361244699.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2020/11/08 04:01
  • (external edit)