Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
talk:proposals:final_countdown [2013/03/02 00:41] v1adimirr |
talk:proposals:final_countdown [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==== I'm making a heading for me ==== | ||
| + | *Needs to address orders and guilds | ||
| + | *Overt statements on limitations on national and settlement citizenship. It's potentially implied that a person can only join one nation at a time but what about dual citizenship? And on this current map players are listed for several settlements at a time, are there going to be any limits with this new system? | ||
| + | *Settlements (and orders!) need to be addressed in the Rules of Engagement more, further defining both what they can do, and what can be done to them. Do they submit to the outlined laws save for being able to withdraw AND join without penalty? It seems like there would be a considerable advantage to that then if that is the case, simply joining in for a battle or raid then withdrawing into political sanctuary after. | ||
| + | *Also, what about definitions for Nether, coastal, air-space, and underground territorial claims? | ||
| + | *I petition for decorative/functional flames to be protected non-block entities as roll-backs may not fix them to my knowledge, and the flint and steel necessary to light them can be costly in large numbers. Additionally functional vines which may be used in place of ladders. | ||
| + | *I petition that a caveat be added to protected non-block entities, that they may be destroyed within reason to gain entry into a territory. (say I made a fence around my land with no other way in other than breaking it) | ||
| + | *That's all for now I guess :I | ||
| + | |||
| + | --- Juinn | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| So I have a few questions: | So I have a few questions: | ||
| Line 23: | Line 36: | ||
| Thank you for the clarification. What about the second part of the last question though? --- //[[people:Bragzor|Bragzor]] 2013-03-02 00:40 UTC+1// | Thank you for the clarification. What about the second part of the last question though? --- //[[people:Bragzor|Bragzor]] 2013-03-02 00:40 UTC+1// | ||
| >The players can choose if they want to be political or not (ie a nation or a city-state). | >The players can choose if they want to be political or not (ie a nation or a city-state). | ||
| + | |||
| + | I want to add **39.** If players had a moderator oversee their transaction, the creditor may ask the moderator to retrieve the items from the debtor upon default. The moderator may withdraw items from debtor's private chests in this case. It is preferred that players try to resolve the dispute between themselves first. --- //[[people:mazznoff|mazznoff]] 2013/03/02 15:09//\\ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Oh dog forced foreclosure :---DDD --- //[[imosgud@gmail.com|Ranshiin]] 2013/03/02 16:17// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Maybe we should write up seperate banking/economic/trade rules like the rules of engagement are seperate. It would be more neat and be easier to ammend. -vlad | ||