Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
talk:people:vladimirr [2013/02/23 03:31] sikandar |
talk:people:vladimirr [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| >>So to sum up, I think we should encourage nations to form as you suggest, but I don't think we should force them to. | >>So to sum up, I think we should encourage nations to form as you suggest, but I don't think we should force them to. | ||
| >> --- //[[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 03:02// | >> --- //[[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 03:02// | ||
| - | >>> Personally, I prefer a large buffer area between my settlements and having a lot of room for expansion - I DO NOT like having my nation being completely urbanized, I prefer some countryside, so am not bothered by having a nation of 4-5 people control between 1 or 3 large biomes. It somewhat restricts where nations may develop, but it is still possible for a nation to choose, they simply must choose a biome that is bordering another nation, or wait until their biome is bordering another nation to officially become one. This restriction could be eased to allow nations to form within 1 biome of another nation's borders. I do not feel that nations should be allowed to grow their initial territory except through conquest on the new map. I additionally do not see moving settlements to another part of the map as a necessarily good idea. Perhaps we can consider them as free cities, the territory associated with the nation but the settlements having their autonomy and rights to the specific area in which they build on and not to be interfered with. With large biomes, a nation should be able to accomodate itself and independent settlements. --- //[[sikandarmc@gmail.com|Sikandar]] 2013/02/23 03:12// | + | >>> Personally, I prefer a large buffer area between my settlements and having a lot of room for expansion - I DO NOT like having my nation being completely urbanized, I prefer some countryside, so am not bothered by having a nation of 4-5 people control between 1 or 3 large biomes. It somewhat restricts where nations may develop, but it is still possible for a nation to choose, they simply must choose a biome that is bordering another nation, or wait until their biome is bordering another nation to officially become one. This restriction could be eased to allow nations to form within 1 biome of another nation's borders. I do not feel that nations should be allowed to grow their initial territory except through conquest on the new map. I additionally do not see moving settlements to another part of the map as a necessarily good idea. Perhaps we can consider them as free cities, the territory associated with the <del>nation</del> the land on which they've built, with the land possibly belonging IN NAME to the nation which claims it, but the settlements having their autonomy and rights to the specific area in which they build on (and perhaps a buffer area) and not to be interfered with. With large biomes, a nation should be able to accomodate itself and independent settlements. --- //[[sikandarmc@gmail.com|Sikandar]] 2013/02/23 03:12// |
| =====Proposed Updated Rules of Engagement===== | =====Proposed Updated Rules of Engagement===== | ||
| Nations are bound by the limitations in the constitution. The Rules of Engagement are needlessly specific and limiting and should be revised as follows: | Nations are bound by the limitations in the constitution. The Rules of Engagement are needlessly specific and limiting and should be revised as follows: | ||