Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
talk:people:sikandar [2013/02/23 04:30] sikandar Proposal for Nations Rules Contingent On a New Map |
talk:people:sikandar [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Please comment on the appropriate section with a > below and your comments. | ||
| + | ---------------------------------- | ||
| ===== Ideas for Nations' Rules, Contingent on a New Map ===== | ===== Ideas for Nations' Rules, Contingent on a New Map ===== | ||
| === Nations, Biome-centrism === | === Nations, Biome-centrism === | ||
| Line 18: | Line 20: | ||
| Furthermore, we can additionally require that a nation must ask a pre-existing settlement before it may claim the biome it is built in. If refused, the biome itself is omitted from the claims rules and nations may claim biomes neighboring the biome which the settlement is built in. A non-politcal settlement may also be built in a nations territory, though they must first make a request to the nation which owns the territory. | Furthermore, we can additionally require that a nation must ask a pre-existing settlement before it may claim the biome it is built in. If refused, the biome itself is omitted from the claims rules and nations may claim biomes neighboring the biome which the settlement is built in. A non-politcal settlement may also be built in a nations territory, though they must first make a request to the nation which owns the territory. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Consequences === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nations would be encouraged to trade with others due to lack of control of each type of biome | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nations would border each other and so interaction would be encouraged | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nations would be encouraged to develop a unique culture based on their biome | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nations would have more of a reason to go to war in order to expand their territory | ||
| + | |||
| + | Risk-style wars | ||
| + | |||
| + | Settlements are allowed their full rights, and may participate in the nations aspect without threat to their settlement by building or allowing its biome to be part of the nations biome territories, or could build away/prevent their biome from becoming a nations territory. | ||
| === Technical Afterthoughts === | === Technical Afterthoughts === | ||
| Line 26: | Line 42: | ||
| At the beginning of the map, an appropriate location should be found to accomodate nations. Seeds should be explored for a good mix of terrain to facilitate this ruleset). | At the beginning of the map, an appropriate location should be found to accomodate nations. Seeds should be explored for a good mix of terrain to facilitate this ruleset). | ||
| + | |||
| + | **A nation should be capable to refuse war requests with no penalty, so long as it does not provide valid casus belli (interpreted by mods) to the other nation for a war** (this is in order for mods to prevent rampant conquering of territories and landruns on other nations) | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Support === | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pro: ✔// | ||
| + | Anti: ✘// | ||
| + | |||
| + | \\ | ||
| + | ^ Name ^ Support ^ Minor Comments (Detail above) ^ | ||
| + | | Sikandar | ✔ | | | ||
| + | | K_Chris | ✔ | This could work if the war rules were heavily modified. 9/10 | | ||
| + | | Koinu | ✔ | This is full autism | | ||
| + | | Smultanius | ✔ | I think a citizen should be allowed to create an independent settlement anywhere with the permission of the biome-owner if there is one, as long as no more than 2 citizens from a single nation are involved with it, that it cannot be used to claim a biome, and that in case of war with the biome's owner, the settlement is immediately handed over with no resistance. | | ||
| + | | [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] | ✘ | Would be fun under certain circumstances I don't think exist now. A large biome is way way way too much land to give to a nation which may only have 5 people. This also vastly increases the incroachment of the political sphere on other non-political players. While in theory they would remain seperate, having a nation surrounding a settlement is just too much man, just too much. I would encourage you to perhaps attempt this in a certain corner of the map with a limited number of already established nations instead of applying it to the entire map. | | | ||
| + | | [[people:mazznoff|mazznoff]] | ✔ | this is glorious, 10/10 | | | ||
| + | --- | ||
| + | |||
| + | holy shit did I really write this? also shako doesn't get it | ||
| + | |||
| + | \>implying we don't just use the wiki for personal pages + teasing chris | ||
| + | |||
| + | chris is a faggot teehee | ||