Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- talk:new_map_petition_2013 [2013/04/28 20:09]
p.p.a
+++ talk:new_map_petition_2013 [2020/11/08 04:02] (current)
@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 Furthermore, this petition is for a new map in any form. Which means that the signatories would be perfectly fine letting the old map stay and just getting a new world via Multiverse, which would not scare away any players but only increase activity.\\
 In addition, there is no reason to be dismissive of the politics autists—if you haven't noticed, those are the players who are the most loyal to the server, form the most long-lived groups, and make it interesting. --- //[[ppachao@googlemail.com|P.P.A.]] 2013/04/28 19:59//
+Anyone not realizing the possibility of having 2 maps at once should be perma banned from the wiki right now. I'm sick of this shit and people constantly ignoring this possibility even though its the most likely scenario if there is a new map. I even dare say some do it to strategically boycott this with such superficial arguments because they are butthurt, like the guys who dont want a new map because "it doesnt solve the problem" and instead prefer a dying server with no players having fun whatsoever. PenOpener why dont you reply to the first part of my post about a minority forcing the majority to play on this shithole, also fun stuff is making new buildings and gaining new resources, not jerking off to your old stuff. Problem with te3 isnt that she doesnt give new map, my problem is that she doesnt reply at all. --- //[[people:areteee|areteee]] 2013/04/29 00:57//
+I'd like to interject. While it is true that maps come and go (and the current one will go fishing eventually), they were achieved alongside deep changes to the game like terrain generation, biomes and all that stuff. According to Te3, that's the **only** condition for a new map, condition that is glaringly inexistant. Hope for 1.6 to bring changes that cannot be kept up with mere new chunks.  --- //[[people:ralxtew|The Dragonbro]] 2013/04/29 23:15//
+So what exactly are you proposing PenOpener? Too keep this map forever just to please people who joined like a month ago whereas the players that had long played in this server are disregarded as trash? I've built a fucking lot in this server. Maybe not much in this current map (though I did built stuff all by my own) but I've let go two maps already in which I built a shit load of stuff I'm proud off, yet I'm not crying to bring those maps back just because I built on them. It's always good to have a fresh start every now and then. If there's a chance to keep both maps, perfect. If not I suggest we keep on going. What do we earn from keeping the same map this whole time, just so we look back at what we made to worship our penis instead of improving not just what we built but also about how the server works? And don't bring the nations argument. I don't know if you know but this is Krautchan's /int/ server and almost everyone there is a nations autist. The reason why most of the players now are not so interested about nations is because they're a bunch of (confirmed) 15 years old who come from 4chan /v/ and other full of shit boards, but when most of our community used to be /int/ it was full of nations, and it happened naturally and probably is what made the server so attractive for many. And to your idea of making lots of threads to bring people in, no. The map is getting contested of empty buildings. What the admin has been suggested is that we explore more, which only leads to the community to be more disperse and be apart of each other. There's little community environment in this server other than the underage 4channers and Poles who came here in their own groups. Other than that, the way this server used to be has changed a lot and for worse. Many of the players that built this server, built this wiki and created the community environment we had left because of this map and the admin's unwillingness to make reforms, which in his own words, he doesn't care.  --- //[[nicabst@hotmail.com|caBastard]] 2013/04/30 01:21//
+>I was just wanting to clarify that the reason for which i withdrew my signature was not because I wanted the map to stay the same, but rather because I feel that I am too new to have a valid opinion. I think the decision should be left to people who have sunk more time into this server. Another thing I wanted to say to you, cabst, was that, although I (and several other Condeurians) are under-age, we are interested in the nations aspect, as well as the economy, business, and other features that this server implements naturally, without over-use of mods (such as factions). This is the reason why I joined this server. If you haven't noticed, we do have a system of government, with different nobility rankings as well as provinces, cities, artifacts and insignia unique to certain nobles, and also have begun to make use of the market system. I, specifically, am quite interested in the building of nations, and have been involved in them since I joined the server. I'd like to end in the fact that I don't want any of the newer players (including myself) really considered in the decision to change the map. We haven't been here long enough to the point that we should matter. I've talked to most Condeurians about how they feel, and they seem to agree that they enjoy the feel of the server (nations, business, etc) enough that they would definately stay, even if they lost their creations.  --- //[[people:darynu|
+Darynu]] 2013/04/30 17:00//