Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
talk:decisions:constitution_and_criminal_law [2013/02/23 01:26] v1adimirr Updated rules of engagement; possible limitations on a new map |
talk:decisions:constitution_and_criminal_law [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 261: | Line 261: | ||
As the person who originally wrote the Rules of Engagement, I say with some embaressment that they were never intended to last this long. They were originally only meant to be a temporary solution to an emergency problem. For this reason, they are absolutely terrible. They're far too complicated and specific and inflexible. No math should be involved in this stuff. I wrote some updated rules that I think will be just as binding but will also be much easier to understand. In addition I posed a few more suggestions about possible rules on a new map. [[talk:people:vladimirr|Click here to read :-----DDDDD]] --- //[[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 01:23// | As the person who originally wrote the Rules of Engagement, I say with some embaressment that they were never intended to last this long. They were originally only meant to be a temporary solution to an emergency problem. For this reason, they are absolutely terrible. They're far too complicated and specific and inflexible. No math should be involved in this stuff. I wrote some updated rules that I think will be just as binding but will also be much easier to understand. In addition I posed a few more suggestions about possible rules on a new map. [[talk:people:vladimirr|Click here to read :-----DDDDD]] --- //[[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 01:23// | ||
+ | |||
+ | I also [[proposals:propositions_on_nation_rules|posted something yesterday]], you can compare it to v1ad's version. His proposition is more specific on battle guidelines (and probably better) than mine, which is also covering other topics like nation privileges. --- //Enton 2013/02/23 01:35// | ||
+ | |||
+ | I was going to write some more about other topics, but what you've written is more or less what I was going to suggest. I support all of it. I think our positions on war are more or less the same with some minor differences. I don't think, as you say, we should ban all war for war's sake if both sides agree to it. However I like your part "During a war, players of a nation can kill members of its enemy nation on its territory at any time." I would add that to my own suggestion. Everything else in there I support completely. --- //[[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 01:47// | ||
+ | |||
+ | I drafted up a coherent [[talk:people:areteee|constitution and rules of engagement here]] that made minor edits to this constitution by including some of the above and some other suggestions people have provided. I believe it to be both in the spirit of mazznoff's constitution while being perhaps more easily applicable to daily life on the server. Please comment and include any concerns you have on it, as I would like to make this proposal to te3 ASAP. Cheers. --- //[[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] 2013/02/23 22:24// |