This is an old revision of the document!

Obviously those caught cheating during a planned battle should be swiftly punished. It seems harsh to punish people before the crime is actually committed though.

This really just draws attention to the client, and isn't a permanent solution. Additionally, SOME NATIONS will be left entirely defenseless during that month, making this seem like a politically motivated proposal. In any case, you may see people leave when their territories are conquered with no chance of defending them during that month. That doesn't seem like a desirable outcome to me.

If this is to pass, it should be amended such that those suspected may not engage in aggressive actions, but may join in defensive battles and wars.

Those engaging in war should have enough respect for their enemies not to cheat, and perhaps a nation would have valid reason to decline an otherwise legitimate war declaration for suspected malicious cheating, or at least bar those specific players suspected of cheating maliciously during planned battles from joining in the war. — Sikandar 2013/04/02 18:16