Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
|
battles:grundescorp_vs_chris [2013/02/07 18:18] rosenmann shako pls |
battles:grundescorp_vs_chris [2020/11/08 04:02] (current) |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| | Result | Killer Chris banned for wasting [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr's]] time| | | Result | Killer Chris banned for wasting [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr's]] time| | ||
| ^ Belligerents || | ^ Belligerents || | ||
| - | | {{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}[[orders:grundeswald|Grundescorp]]| {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer_Chris]] | | + | | {{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}[[orders_and_guilds:orders:grundeswald|Grundescorp]]| {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer_Chris]] | |
| ^ Leaders and Commanders || | ^ Leaders and Commanders || | ||
| |{{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}Greenkitten | {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer Chris]] | | |{{:orders:grundeswald_corp.png?22|}}Greenkitten | {{http://i.imgur.com/ieyyjw8.png?22}}[[people:k_chris|Killer Chris]] | | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| </WRAP> | </WRAP> | ||
| - | Grundescorp v. Chris, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the [[orders:order_of_the_staff|Oceania States Supreme Court]] on the issue of harassment. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, [[orders:grundeswald#former_locations|Grundescorp v. Shakomatic]], the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14.88th Amendment extended to a company's decision to undertake a project, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating these projects: protecting international interests and protecting the company's image. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a project, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of projects to the company's work schedule. | + | Grundescorp v. Chris, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), is a landmark decision by the [[orders_and_guilds:orders:order_of_the_staff|Oceania States Supreme Court]] on the issue of harassment. Decided simultaneously with a companion case, [[orders_and_guilds:orders:grundeswald#former_locations|Grundescorp v. Shakomatic]], the Court ruled 7–2 that a right to privacy under the due process clause of the 14.88th Amendment extended to a company's decision to undertake a project, but that right must be balanced against the state's two legitimate interests in regulating these projects: protecting international interests and protecting the company's image. Arguing that these state interests became stronger over the course of a project, the Court resolved this balancing test by tying state regulation of projects to the company's work schedule. |
| ====== Background ====== | ====== Background ====== | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
| ====== The Verdict ====== | ====== The Verdict ====== | ||
| - | Harassing the [[orders:order_of_the_staff|The Order of the Staff]] for compensation and justice. [[people:tangaloa|Tangaloa]] mysteriously disappeared, forcing [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] to come online. After determining that Chris was wasting the staff's time his house was restored and [[memes:mod_abuse|Chris was temporarily banned]]. | + | Harassing the [[orders_and_guilds:orders:order_of_the_staff|The Order of the Staff]] for compensation and justice. [[people:tangaloa|Tangaloa]] [[memes:mod_abuse|mysteriously disappeared]], forcing [[people:vladimirr|V1adimirr]] to come online. After determining that Chris was wasting the staff's time his house was restored and [[memes:mod_abuse|Chris was temporarily banned]]. |